Re: e2e

Subject: Re: e2e
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:37:45 -0400
Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD3701341995@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Columbia University
References: <20070726232013.30BFF136C82@aharp.ittns.northwestern.edu> <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD3701341995@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>

But I should point people at RFC 4924.  (No, I won't try to summarize
it.)

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: e2e
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

References:
- e2e
  - From: John Kristoff
- RE: e2e
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: Re: RFC Announcement Format
Next by Date: Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org
Previous by thread: RE: e2e
Next by thread: Re: e2e
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: e2e

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.