Re: Charging I-Ds
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Charging I-Ds



Tim Chown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 04:51:56PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> To summary: what problem do we try to solve?
> 
> either reducing ietf costs, or increasing ietf income
> 
> do we know the 'cost per i-d'?   or is that meaningless anyway while
> the i-d live in the automated part of the process?

Expected result of charging per I-D: bigger I-Ds.

/psa

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.