Re: IPv4

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Subject: Re: IPv4
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 00:02:04 +0200
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD375A2D9E@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD375A2D9E@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>

On 3-aug-2007, at 23:54, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

What you call extortion others call capitalism.

Either an ip address allocation is property or it isn't.

Right. And the people who've been in charge of IP addresses for the last decade and a half or so, have always maintained that it isn't. So capitalism doesn't apply here.

I can't sell my phone number or address, either.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPv4
  - From: Clint Chaplin

References:
- RE: IPv4
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: RE: IPv4
Next by Date: Re: IPv4
Previous by thread: RE: IPv4
Next by thread: Re: IPv4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IPv4

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.