Re: e2e

[Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>]

>>
>> this is  not a way to make the network more robust.
>>   
> Robust for what? Spammers? The simple fact of the matter is that the
> alternative is to just shut down port 25 given the growth in both volume
> and complexity to filter.  That ain't robust either. Dealing with false
> positives is the cost of doing business on the internet these days.
> Welcome
> to reality.
people who cite "reality" generally do so because they lack
justification for their statements.

find a way to make reputation servers accountable to both sender and
recipient, then we can talk about robustness.  until then, they're just
another form of DoS attack.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf