Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the curse of the S(imple) protocols, was: Re: e2e



> , while it gets no where near real
> authentication, the ability to write a pair of rules that say 
>
> 	* if the message comes to "john+bbnk at example.com", and
> 	isn't from an address in the "bigbank.com" domain, it is
> 	trash and can be discarded, and
> 	
> 	* if the message appears to come from the "bigbank.com"
> 	and isn't addressed to john+bbnk at example.com", then it
> 	is trash and can be discarded.
>
> turns out to be a powerful tool that is not easily defeated and
> that does not require multiple handshakes between recipient and
> putative sender.
I've been using it for years, and entirely agree.

Keith


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.