Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all

To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
From: Tony Li <tli at cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:05:49 -0700
Authentication-results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=tli@cisco.com; dkim=pass (si g from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>, ietf at ietf.org
Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=302; t=1187399154; x=1188263154; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=tli@cisco.com; z=From:=20Tony=20Li=20<tli@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20IPv6=20addresses=20really=20are=20scarce=20after=20al l |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Steven=20M.=20Bellovin=22=20<smb@cs.columbia.edu>; bh=APDqvJcBXB4MRuYe+3V8dVSOeps/OgCdB1Tpslwphhk=; b=s2uLtXrBY9qYHe8iFKX90MY3XXyJkWBaG4aNRFUXF+6roGqE0sFIuDekpe+/Fj1wWsD13746 TPf+IHPe1d0krNp1rrQjfrTAQRehfQ5AcEcRkokPvaLVSNFR8+/jcVFv;
In-reply-to: <20070818005423.2FA927660D8@berkshire.machshav.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0E18022@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net> <46C613E0.8010909@bogus.com> <46C629D2.20009@cs.utk.edu> <46C636E3.6030405@bogus.com> <20070818005423.2FA927660D8@berkshire.machshav.com>


On Aug 17, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:

I'm not sure what your point is -- I took Keith's comment to mean that
home NATs with v6 were completely unacceptable.

/64's do NOT imply that there's NAT functionality involved, just that there's a single subnet, yes?

Tony

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: michael.dillon
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
  - From: Steven M. Bellovin

Prev by Date: Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all - /64 FIB burden
Previous by thread: Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
Next by thread: Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.