Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Subject: Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
From: Michael Thomas <mat at cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:21:17 -0700
Authentication-results: imail.cisco.com; header.From=mat@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/oregon verified; );
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>, Douglas Otis <dotis at mail-abuse.org>, Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>, ietf at ietf.org
Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=643; t=1187643579; x=1188507579; c=relaxed/simple; s=oregon; h=To:Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mat@cisco.com; z=From:=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mat@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20New=20models=20for=20email=20(Re=3A=20e2e) |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Hallam-Baker,=20Phillip=22=20<pbaker@verisign.com>; bh=nmuTYGeY3klxnbQDtvtYK7yX8lY14cw1w++TYDPKUkQ=; b=Clg2hUdJNlndufEVKaw9sgYtdrSqeb5apn1S+BpxR25hWRcHHGJTbQ4bhW1LsfwgIH+0i2Ws y4YIbDRRHsXp30lWjgjIj5wTJW/EwwU+Y/FX0KxeNtYkKwL0W5QbnWX5;
In-reply-to: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD370139FE68@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD370139FE68@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070509 Thunderbird/1.5.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

I have a slightly different take from John here.
My strong belief is that a proposal for a new protocol that does the same thing as SMTP but slightly better is a total non starter. No matter how much better the protocol is the cost of transition will dominate.
The only way that I see a new email infrastructure emerging is as a part of a more general infrastructure to support multi-modal communication, both synchronous and asynchronous, bilateral and multilateral, Instant Messaging, email, voice, video, network news all combined in one unified protocol.


You mean SIP?

      Mike

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  - From: Dave Crocker

References:
- RE: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
Next by Date: RE: New models for email (Re: e2e)
Previous by thread: RE: New models for email (Re: e2e)
Next by thread: Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.