Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)

To: Tony Finch <dot at dotat.at>
Subject: Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:25:12 -0700
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708220017260.2638@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD3701341995@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <8244E3BE-1A26-4B0A-99DC-0DF7AF7F8810@cisco.com> <46C29647.5070202@qualcomm.com> <FABD8E3A-D5CF-4EED-927B-A039BCAEE90C@cisco.com> <46C36461.2060907@cs.utk.e du> <46C36599.9040907@cisco.com> <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0DBB6F4@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.ne t> <46C4658E.6030003@cs.utk.edu> <p06240602c2ea243c8fd3@[76.102.94.28]> <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0E17BD1@E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net> <46C4CB54.9040403@cs.utk.edu> <7F5E2783-218A-45B3-9614-162C6768386D@mail-abuse.org> <21683DDFB4C3FA8717CE7818@p3.JCK.COM> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708220017260.2638@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Reply-to: dcrocker at bbiw.net
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

Tony Finch wrote:

I don't understand how it can be easier to do anti-spam checks in an IM2000 design than in current email.

It is always easier to create the perfect solution on paper, and then compare it to the imperfections of established practice.

Paper beats rock.

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- RE: e2e
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: e2e
  - From: Fred Baker
- Re: e2e
  - From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: e2e
  - From: Fred Baker
- Re: e2e
  - From: Michael Thomas
- Re: e2e
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: e2e
  - From: Ted Hardie
- RE: e2e
  - From: michael.dillon
- Re: e2e
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: e2e
  - From: Douglas Otis
- New models for email (Re: e2e)
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
  - From: Tony Finch

Prev by Date: Re: Review of draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05
Next by Date: Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
Previous by thread: Re: New models for email (Re: e2e)
Next by thread: Re: e2e
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.