Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard

A couple of quick comments:

It isn't clear from the draft if this is intended to be Standards Track; I assume it is.

I don't see any reason why a new proposed standard should allow obsolete syntax (specifically, obs-FWS in section 2).

Given that the other official standards are named "XMPP" rather than "Jabber", why isn't the field name "XMPP-ID"?

The forgery discussion in section 5 might reference 4871 (DKIM-BASE).

eric

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.