Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-saintandre-jabberid (The Jabber-ID Header Field) to Proposed Standard




I think a much better design would be one that supported many protocols and took advantage of the flexibility or URIs instead of just jabber - for example a header that looked like


IMPP: xmpp:juliet at example.com

The way we did vcard might be a good thing to look at, or heck, just attach a vcard.

(sorry for few of you that got duplicate on this - sent to wrong list first time)


On Aug 24, 2007, at 6:51 AM, The IESG wrote:

The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:


- 'The Jabber-ID Header Field '
   <draft-saintandre-jabberid-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2007-09-21. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg at ietf.org instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.


The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-jabberid-05.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi? command=view_id&dTag=14260&rfc_flag=0



_______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.