Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review

[Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>]

Sorry.  No it does not make any changes.  Our practices remain the same.

Russ

At 02:34 PM 8/27/2007, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> Hi, Russ,
>
>
> > Spencer:
> >
> > This document is intended to set expectations.  It does not make 
> > any normative changes to RFC 2026.
> >
> > Russ
>
> Got that part.
>
> I'm actually asking whether the ION makes any changes in the 
> expectations set in the 02 version of the now-dead IESG draft, which 
> the IESG has been referencing in conversations about DISCUSS ballot 
> positions for a while now - doesn't look like it, but wanted to make 
> sure what you guys think.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Spencer
>
> > At 01:08 PM 8/27/2007, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> > > Hi, Russ,
> > >
> > > A quick comparison with version 02 of this draft (from 2006, 
> > > currently listed in DEAD state) is showing minor typo corrections 
> > > and a million format changes, but the criteria haven't changed in 
> > > any meaningful way. Is this your understanding also?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Spencer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf