Re: FW: [Inquiry #96698] Help!

To: "Herb Overstreet" <herbo at kineticblue.com>, Ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: FW: [Inquiry #96698] Help!
From: "Hex Star" <hexstar at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:54:11 -0700
Cc:
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=EFlRgvfyM0rDHOyI32FvgKjrrsu73KoiyfZ90537r94YgXtgsPENqT3U1ZOzGzxy2tvaWoRP+WgCyXH3cgpxZ3g7jOGTiIdELqJlhaL/MbGFwgC7NO5stIrTLH4xnAfYfKjgzFzJwdz5Rle1iiKpYAAZ/CmZmMcYeBLNNWrGaZk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=SYUuE+3Ec5bdU7jk9Ci7xbP3fZoTUo1PKL29uLMcB9dxU1U0f9tahWxubJiWafC/tttZva+pq5J8MsAKwKmHHAKbH4RoW9Wok9WOWJBcjgpxG0zwGzxu1NUjUrKdb9L0b6QwWKeUhZBWMSQZPcBEL1oS6j8s3GMYXRweROu6sSg=
In-reply-to: <08E461D5C6F5F14CA1752C8EE19E66F045B3@kinetic-exchang.kb-wr.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <08E461D5C6F5F14CA1752C8EE19E66F045B3@kinetic-exchang.kb-wr.com>

There was some discussion on this when there was that whole Firefox exploit issue where one could pass potentially harmful parameters to programs using things such as mailto: in the address. mailto: is not a protocol but is simply a tag I guess you could say that a program registered to itself, this is easily doable for any program. I do not believe this is considered a protocol...

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- FW: [Inquiry #96698] Help!
  - From: Herb Overstreet

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call comment on draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv-iana-00.txt
Next by Date: RE: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
Previous by thread: FW: [Inquiry #96698] Help!
Next by thread: Re: [ppml] IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: FW: [Inquiry #96698] Help!

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.