Re: [Ietf-http-auth] Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)

[Bernard Aboba <aboba at internaut.com>]

Alexey Melnikov said:

"This statement taken in isolation is certainly correct. However if the 
original LC didn't ask the right question, don't you think this makes 
answers meaningless?"

The reviews are not meaningless.  They represent the feedback of the IETF 
community.  Rather than asking a different question in hope of getting a 
different answer, it would be better to address the feedback in an 
attempt to achieve consensus (or at least a lower level of disagreement). 

IMHO, it also might be appropriate to find a better forum and process 
for  discussing and moving forward on this document.  The topic is 
important, and one that the IETF has an opportunity to make a contribution 
to, over time.  I think this may be a case where the existing BOF process 
has limited our options.  For an alternative, see:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf