Re: Next step on web phishing draft (draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt)

[Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>]

Bernard,

> I agree with EKR here.  Failed consensus is failed consensus.  RFC 2026 
> does not support the process that has been recommended here. 
>
>   

Perhaps Sam and Lisa can explain a bit more as to what process they 
intend to use.  It seems that Alexey is providing a forum for discussion 
to improve the document, and I see nothing wrong with that.  I would 
imagine that both the IESG and the community will still get their say, 
so what precisely is the problem?

This having been said, it seems to me that in order to address EKR's 
(and perhaps others') concerns, the document will need substantial 
work.  I welcome efforts to improve that work.  Where should that 
happen?  Must Sam do it alone?

Eliot


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf