Re: draft-aboba-sg-experiment-02.txt

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>]

Bernard Aboba wrote:

> > Bernard,
> > I quickly looked through your draft. I don't think it applies for a case when
> > there is no intention to form a WG. Is my understanding correct?
> >    
> Section 2 says:
>
> "The Charter for a Study Group SHOULD include at least the following 
> milestones:
>
>      o Development of a Working Group Charter.
>
>      o Development of a document demonstrating fulfillment of
>        the Working Group formation criteria described in
>        [RFC2418] Section 2.1."
>
> So the expectation is that Study Groups will focus on enabling WG 
> formation.  Are you imagining other scenarios in which a SG might be 
> useful? 
>  
I am looking for a lightweight process that doesn't introduce as much 
delay as a typical WG does. In particular I am interested in something 
that might work for reviewing and building consensus around a well 
defined piece of work (typically a document). One use case I have is a 
document that is not a product of a WG, but  which defines a framework 
shared by two existing working groups.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf