Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it



Hello,

Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun at itojun.org> writes:

> 	because, in the end, ULA (whichever flavor it is) leads to
>       IPv6-to-IPv6 NAT.

I prefer losing some bytes in all my packets between locations using
different ULA-D prefixes to get an underlying VPN / tunneling
infrastructure. This allows me to keep things flat, i.e. pure routing.

itojun, let's just stop using the 3 letters word. It does not exist
anymore.

Cheers,

a+

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.