RE: Call for action vs. lost opportunity (Was: Re: Renumbering)

[<michael.dillon at bt.com>]

> I'm not particularly interested in getting into a "Yes it is! 
> No it isn't!" debate.  I will merely point out that IPv6 has 
> been implemented and is being deployed as IPv4 with more 
> bits. 

If more people would get involved in developing a best practices
document for IPv6, perhaps through a wiki like www.getipv6.info then
this would be less of a problem.

We need some document to point to in order to explain why IPv6 is not
just IPv4 with more bits.

--Michael Dillon

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf