Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?

[Lars Eggert <lars.eggert at nokia.com>]

On 2007-9-17, at 12:13, ext Fred Baker wrote:
> Dumb question of the month. With the exception of the last claim  
> ("...can prioritize..."), this could just as easily describe SCTP.  
> What here is new? And define "prioritize"?

For how this relates to SCTP, let me refer you to Section 6. (And  
yes, there are obvious similarities here to SCTP, but also RFC2140- 
like integrated congestion control, etc.)

"Prioritize" meaning how a sender allocates the available path  
capacity for the SST "bundle" between connection instances. A demo  
that Bryan did that showed HTTP over SST dynamically adjusted  
priorities such that objects that were being rendered on the screen  
were transmitted at a higher priority, even while scrolling around a  
large page.

> On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:02 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
> > You might be interested in Bryan Ford's SST paper from this year's  
> > SIGCOMM:
> >
> > Structured Streams: a New Transport Abstraction. Bryan Ford. ACM  
> > SIGCOMM 2007, August 27-31, 2007, Kyoto, Japan. http:// 
> > www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/sst-abs.html

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf