Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: session layers, was Re: Renumbering ... Should we consider an association that spans transports?



On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, John Day wrote:

> I am afraid that I must agree with Fred.  There is nothing very new in this
> paper and its publication is merely another indication of how far down the
> blind alley we have gone.  I was surprised SIGCOMM even published dressing up
> X.25 Fast Select with fancy words.  Amazing.

Isn't Fast Select more like RFC 1644 TCP for Transactions than Ford's
Structured Streams? IIUC, X.25 and SCTP have similarly static multiplexing
configurations and delimited records, unlike SST.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
IRISH SEA: SOUTHERLY, BACKING NORTHEASTERLY FOR A TIME, 3 OR 4. SLIGHT OR
MODERATE. SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLY POOR.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.