Re: XML updates Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XML updates Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-simple-xml-patch-ops (An Extensible Markup Language (XML) Patch Operations Framework Utilizing XML Path Language (XPath) Selectors) to Proposed Standard

I would be happy to encourage work on IETF-wide guidance for XML usage (I guess that's what I'm doing now?).  The Apps area has an XML directorate and supposedly we have some XML expertise to call on -- sometimes we do XML usage reviews for the other IETF areas.

Lisa

On Sep 18, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Tom.Petch wrote:

OK, XPath 2.0 looks more attractive to me as a user but I am not familiar with

the uptake of XPath 2.0 (and does this make

my point that more IETF-wide guidance could be valuable eg, to set another  pack

of leverets running, XSD v RELAX NG v ...)


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.