Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it)

[Roger Jorgensen <rogerj at jorgensen.no>]

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>    > From: Paul Vixie <paul at vix.com>
>
>    > ULA-G (and therefore ULA-C) is not an end run around PI space, it's
>    > an end run around the DFZ.
>    > some day, the people who are then responsible for global address
>    > policy and global internet operations, will end the "tyranny of the
>    > core" by which we cripple all network owners in their available
>    > choices of address space, based solely on the tempermental fragility
>    > of the internet's core routing system.
<snip>
> What I hear you saying, in your references to the DFZ/core, is that you
> aren't happy with the notion that there's a large part of the internetwork
> in which more or less all destinations are reachable? If so, in effect,
> you're visualizing a system in which reachability is less ubiquitous? I.e.
> for a given destination address X, there will be significant parts of the
> internetwork from which a packet sent to X will not reach X - and not
> because of access controls which explicitly prevent it, but simply because
> that part of the internetwork doesn't care to carry routing information for
> that destination. Is that right?

what I read into it is... the future internet might not be structured as 
it is today, we might get a "internet" on the side which don't touch the 
DFZ at all. Mostly regionbased traffic...



--

------------------------------
Roger Jorgensen              | - ROJO9-RIPE  - RJ85P-NORID
roger at jorgensen.no           | - IPv6 is The Key!
-------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf