Re: Renumbering
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Renumbering
On 19-sep-2007, at 17:48, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
All of those things are broken, of course. That doesn't change the
fact they exist and folks in the operational community will not be
impressed with a "solution" that ignores those problems.
Sometimes ignoring a problem really does make it go away. Install a
workaround, on the other hand, and the brokenness remains non-obvious
so it persists.
I'm not advocating going around and breaking implementations that
don't fully conform with specs on purpose, but if doing the right
thing means that out-of-spec implementations see some problems, I can
usually live with that.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.