Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it)

[jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)]

    > From: "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen at sprunk.org>

    > .. ULA-C/G leaks will not collide with each other. This means that,
    > unlike RFC1918 which is _impossible_ for ISPs to route for multiple
    > customers, ULA-C/G routes _can_ be routed publicly. Any prohibition
    > on doing so by the IETF or RIRs can (and IMHO, will) be overridden by
    > customers paying for those routes to be accepted.

Which would argue that the only realistic way to make *absolutely certain*
that IPv6 "private" addresses truly *cannot* be used out in the 'main'
internetwork is to allocate the same ranges of addresses to multiple
parties.

Anything else is just PI with a few speedbumps, and a different label.

	Noel

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf