![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Second, the notion that RIRs set addressing policy is one that has not been in place forever. Indeed, it has evolved very slowly and mostly by assertion by the RIRs that they have that authority --assertions that, in other contexts, might look a lot like either filling a vacuum or turf grabs depending on one's perspective. While they have always (since there have been RIRs) had broad discretion within their own regions, and it has always been recognized some coordination discourages forum-shopping and other bad behavior, global address policy was historically set by IANA in conjunction with the IAB, not by the RIRs (although I assume their advice was certainly welcomed).
I also believe that the RIRs have some obligation to consult the IETF before making a major policy change and to pay careful attention to anything rational the IETF has to say.
S
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.