Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C)

[Paul Vixie <paul at vix.com>]

> Without going into debate about consenting adults, and while I might
> disagree with Paul in certain fine points, I'd suggest that we consider the
> ULA-G proposal within the IETF and ask that Paul submit it as an I-D.  ULA-G
> could have broad application if in fact we solve the multihoming problem
> (IMHO) and I'd like to be the optimist and say that we can do that.

i'll need new coauthors.  i ain't signing up for this alone, and the authors
of ULA-C only wrote it up so that we would all know what ideas had been
abandoned, not as a way forward.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf