![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On 19-sep-2007, at 21:06, Tony Hain wrote:
It is clear that people on this list have never really run a network as they
appear to be completely missing the point, but there is no reason to respond
to each individually...
[why ULA-C is not a problem]
I agree 100%
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAj-0005oF-Jx for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400 Received: from sequoia.muada.com ([83.149.65.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAi-0003T8-9G for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400 Received: from [82.192.90.28] (nirrti.muada.com [82.192.90.28]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8KCQLhO013023 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:26:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch at muada.com) In-Reply-To: <0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net> References: <11452.1189607641 at marajade.sandelman.ca> <61769.1189616824 at sa.vix.com> <3009e5840709121107o78cdd94fu907ab4de187b5d78 at mail.gmail.com> <46E90E04.30000 at piuha.net> <0F18F924-0B75-4F7C-9DCF-2759E9CECB61 at cs.ucla.edu> <46EDFEC0.4060308 at piuha.net> <07ea01c7fa05$e68ae030$b3a0a090$ at net> <p06240600c315a807196a at [98.207.7.244]> <0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <CFC5BF11-541E-4C51-880C-24D1C156A728 at muada.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:28:58 +0200 To: alh-ietf at tndh.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89 Cc: 'Ted Hardie' <hardie at qualcomm.com>, 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko at piuha.net>, 'IETF Discussion' <ietf at ietf.org>, 'Paul Vixie' <paul at vix.com>, 'Lixia Zhang' <lixia at cs.ucla.edu> Subject: Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it) X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org> List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
On 19-sep-2007, at 21:06, Tony Hain wrote:
It is clear that people on this list have never really run a network as they
appear to be completely missing the point, but there is no reason to respond
to each individually...
[why ULA-C is not a problem]
I agree 100%
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAj-0005oF-Jx for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400 Received: from sequoia.muada.com ([83.149.65.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAi-0003T8-9G for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400 Received: from [82.192.90.28] (nirrti.muada.com [82.192.90.28]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8KCQLhO013023 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:26:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch at muada.com) In-Reply-To: <0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net> References: <11452.1189607641 at marajade.sandelman.ca> <61769.1189616824 at sa.vix.com> <3009e5840709121107o78cdd94fu907ab4de187b5d78 at mail.gmail.com> <46E90E04.30000 at piuha.net> <0F18F924-0B75-4F7C-9DCF-2759E9CECB61 at cs.ucla.edu> <46EDFEC0.4060308 at piuha.net> <07ea01c7fa05$e68ae030$b3a0a090$ at net> <p06240600c315a807196a at [98.207.7.244]> <0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <CFC5BF11-541E-4C51-880C-24D1C156A728 at muada.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:28:58 +0200 To: alh-ietf at tndh.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89 Cc: 'Ted Hardie' <hardie at qualcomm.com>, 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko at piuha.net>, 'IETF Discussion' <ietf at ietf.org>, 'Paul Vixie' <paul at vix.com>, 'Lixia Zhang' <lixia at cs.ucla.edu> Subject: Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it) X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org> List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
On 19-sep-2007, at 21:06, Tony Hain wrote:
It is clear that people on this list have never really run a network as they
appear to be completely missing the point, but there is no reason to respond
to each individually...
[why ULA-C is not a problem]
I agree 100%
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAj-0005oF-Jx for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400 Received: from sequoia.muada.com ([83.149.65.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAi-0003T8-9G for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400 Received: from [82.192.90.28] (nirrti.muada.com [82.192.90.28]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8KCQLhO013023 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:26:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch at muada.com) In-Reply-To: <0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net> References: <11452.1189607641 at marajade.sandelman.ca> <61769.1189616824 at sa.vix.com> <3009e5840709121107o78cdd94fu907ab4de187b5d78 at mail.gmail.com> <46E90E04.30000 at piuha.net> <0F18F924-0B75-4F7C-9DCF-2759E9CECB61 at cs.ucla.edu> <46EDFEC0.4060308 at piuha.net> <07ea01c7fa05$e68ae030$b3a0a090$ at net> <p06240600c315a807196a at [98.207.7.244]> <0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <CFC5BF11-541E-4C51-880C-24D1C156A728 at muada.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:28:58 +0200 To: alh-ietf at tndh.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89 Cc: 'Ted Hardie' <hardie at qualcomm.com>, 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko at piuha.net>, 'IETF Discussion' <ietf at ietf.org>, 'Paul Vixie' <paul at vix.com>, 'Lixia Zhang' <lixia at cs.ucla.edu> Subject: Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it) X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org> List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
On 19-sep-2007, at 21:06, Tony Hain wrote:
It is clear that people on this list have never really run a network as they
appear to be completely missing the point, but there is no reason to respond
to each individually...
[why ULA-C is not a problem]
I agree 100%
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.