Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it)



On 19-sep-2007, at 21:06, Tony Hain wrote:

It is clear that people on this list have never really run a network as they
appear to be completely missing the point, but there is no reason to respond
to each individually...

[why ULA-C is not a problem]

I agree 100%

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf









with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAj-0005oF-Jx
	for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400
Received: from sequoia.muada.com ([83.149.65.1])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAi-0003T8-9G
	for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400
Received: from [82.192.90.28] (nirrti.muada.com [82.192.90.28])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8KCQLhO013023
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:26:22 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from iljitsch at muada.com)
In-Reply-To: <0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net>
References: <11452.1189607641 at marajade.sandelman.ca>
	<61769.1189616824 at sa.vix.com>
	<3009e5840709121107o78cdd94fu907ab4de187b5d78 at mail.gmail.com>
	<46E90E04.30000 at piuha.net>
	<0F18F924-0B75-4F7C-9DCF-2759E9CECB61 at cs.ucla.edu>
	<46EDFEC0.4060308 at piuha.net> <07ea01c7fa05$e68ae030$b3a0a090$ at net>
	<p06240600c315a807196a at [98.207.7.244]>
	<0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <CFC5BF11-541E-4C51-880C-24D1C156A728 at muada.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:28:58 +0200
To: alh-ietf at tndh.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: 'Ted Hardie' <hardie at qualcomm.com>, 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko at piuha.net>,
	'IETF Discussion' <ietf at ietf.org>, 'Paul Vixie' <paul at vix.com>,
	'Lixia Zhang' <lixia at cs.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it)
X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

On 19-sep-2007, at 21:06, Tony Hain wrote:

It is clear that people on this list have never really run a network as they
appear to be completely missing the point, but there is no reason to respond
to each individually...

[why ULA-C is not a problem]

I agree 100%

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf









with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAj-0005oF-Jx
	for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400
Received: from sequoia.muada.com ([83.149.65.1])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAi-0003T8-9G
	for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400
Received: from [82.192.90.28] (nirrti.muada.com [82.192.90.28])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8KCQLhO013023
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:26:22 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from iljitsch at muada.com)
In-Reply-To: <0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net>
References: <11452.1189607641 at marajade.sandelman.ca>
	<61769.1189616824 at sa.vix.com>
	<3009e5840709121107o78cdd94fu907ab4de187b5d78 at mail.gmail.com>
	<46E90E04.30000 at piuha.net>
	<0F18F924-0B75-4F7C-9DCF-2759E9CECB61 at cs.ucla.edu>
	<46EDFEC0.4060308 at piuha.net> <07ea01c7fa05$e68ae030$b3a0a090$ at net>
	<p06240600c315a807196a at [98.207.7.244]>
	<0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <CFC5BF11-541E-4C51-880C-24D1C156A728 at muada.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:28:58 +0200
To: alh-ietf at tndh.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: 'Ted Hardie' <hardie at qualcomm.com>, 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko at piuha.net>,
	'IETF Discussion' <ietf at ietf.org>, 'Paul Vixie' <paul at vix.com>,
	'Lixia Zhang' <lixia at cs.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it)
X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

On 19-sep-2007, at 21:06, Tony Hain wrote:

It is clear that people on this list have never really run a network as they
appear to be completely missing the point, but there is no reason to respond
to each individually...

[why ULA-C is not a problem]

I agree 100%

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf









with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAj-0005oF-Jx
	for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400
Received: from sequoia.muada.com ([83.149.65.1])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYLAi-0003T8-9G
	for ietf at ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:21 -0400
Received: from [82.192.90.28] (nirrti.muada.com [82.192.90.28])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8KCQLhO013023
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:26:22 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from iljitsch at muada.com)
In-Reply-To: <0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net>
References: <11452.1189607641 at marajade.sandelman.ca>
	<61769.1189616824 at sa.vix.com>
	<3009e5840709121107o78cdd94fu907ab4de187b5d78 at mail.gmail.com>
	<46E90E04.30000 at piuha.net>
	<0F18F924-0B75-4F7C-9DCF-2759E9CECB61 at cs.ucla.edu>
	<46EDFEC0.4060308 at piuha.net> <07ea01c7fa05$e68ae030$b3a0a090$ at net>
	<p06240600c315a807196a at [98.207.7.244]>
	<0ad401c7faf0$245c9210$6d15b630$ at net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <CFC5BF11-541E-4C51-880C-24D1C156A728 at muada.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:28:58 +0200
To: alh-ietf at tndh.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: 'Ted Hardie' <hardie at qualcomm.com>, 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko at piuha.net>,
	'IETF Discussion' <ietf at ietf.org>, 'Paul Vixie' <paul at vix.com>,
	'Lixia Zhang' <lixia at cs.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: ULA-C (Was: Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it)
X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

On 19-sep-2007, at 21:06, Tony Hain wrote:

It is clear that people on this list have never really run a network as they
appear to be completely missing the point, but there is no reason to respond
to each individually...

[why ULA-C is not a problem]

I agree 100%

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf










Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.