Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C)



On 20-sep-2007, at 14:32, Keith Moore wrote:

If applications don't want to worry about addressing issues, the only
solution is that applications don't get to see addresses in the first
place.

If you can find a good way to let hosts and network stacks sort out
those addressing issues, then fewer applications will bother to manage
those addresses themselves. But absent such a way to do that (and
trial-and-error is not a good way, nor is IPv6 "address selection") then
more applications will be forced to manage those addresses in order to
provide decent service to users.

Well, a start would be a "connectbyname()" API call that takes care of name-to-address mapping and trying different addresses until one works.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.