Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C)



> > absent such a method, the network operators who dominate the bottom-up RIR
> > policy process are almost certainly going to make PI hard to qualify for.
> 
> In the ARIN region, one can qualify for PI today with as few as 256 hosts,
> and there was a recent proposal that would have indirectly dropped that to
> 64 hosts.  I cannot justify calling that "hard"; it's arguably "too easy".

would it scale?  (would it be allowed to try?)

i'm not talking about the current situation, which is a social experiment.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.