Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition



Ray,

I don't think it's quite fair to refer to ostriches
when ARIN is already on record:
http://www.arin.net/v6/v6-resolution.html

Also, for those who like to see things in real time,
there's always http://penrose.uk6x.com/

Regards
   Brian Carpenter
   University of Auckland




On 2007-10-03 02:47, Ray Plzak wrote:
Head in the sand is substituting the statement "shortage of IP addresses" for the condition of the inability to use the addresses (take your pick when it comes to infrastructure deficiencies).

Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Chown [mailto:tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 9:32 AM
To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition

On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:05:39AM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
Ray Plzak wrote:
The shortage of IPv4 addresses in developing countries in a red
herring.
that has to rank as one of the most bizarre statements that's ever
been
made on the ietf list.
More of an ostrich than a herring?


.="""=._ / ., .`. /__(,_.-' || ` /| || / | || \| || ~~~~~ ~ |\ ~~!)~~~~~~~


Tim

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.