![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Secretariat tells me that Spammers are responding to TDMA queries so that their mail goes through. They have made the suggestion that we clear the list of people once per year.
Isn't there an engineering principle that if something is broken, you don't fix it by breaking it even worse?
Naive challenge/response systems like TMDA never worked very well,
John,
The IETF uses Spamassassin before mail ever hits TMDA, so most of the readily detected junk never gets there. From the time I was watching what was happening with TMDA at ietf.org, the problems you describe just weren't happening; what was happening was that literally 99% of the spam that survived Spamassassin was getting caught. That's a serious estimate from the impact of TMDA on the IESG list. The chain:
Spamassassin -> TMDA -> mailman moderation
basically does the job just fine.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.