Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr (Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes) to Informational RFC



On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, ken carlberg wrote:
On Oct 2, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
It is not clear that consensus in the IETF and deployments is strong enough to approve/recommend any specific treatment for standards track DSCP values.

could you expand on this observation?

I don't recall when was the last (Diffserv-based) QoS talk at NANOG or similar operator-rich meeting. (Sure, there is the tutorial, but it doesn't count.)


Seems like a potential indication that most typical ISPs aren't working on or interested in this, this stuff is so trivial, or that coordination is not necessary.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.