Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spammers answering TMDA Queries
SM wrote:
> Spam can pass SPF, Sender-ID and are even DK and DKIM signed
> nowadays. One can't blame spammers for not being early adopters. :-)
> TMDA may cause backscatter.
After an SPF PASS the "backscatter" by definition can't hit an
innocent bystander. By the same definition any "backscatter"
after an SPF FAIL hits an innocent bystander, and therefore is
net abuse.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-spam-05.txt )
> provides an interesting insight.
It certainly explains why [18]...[21] are unnecessary for SIP ;-)
Frank
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
