Re: comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt



John Klensin said:

"	(2) As the discussion goes on, if appears to me that, in
	practice, an SG is little more than a normal WG with an
	unusual set of charter-time constraints."

No, because WGs cannot be formed to come up with a WG charter (or
RFC 2418 Section 2.1 criteria for WG formation). 

	"The worst risk associated with introducing
	SGs is that, just as we have evolved from "A BOF, or
	sometimes two, are optional steps to help get a WG
	organized and focused"  to "BOFs are almost always
	required", we might evolve into the expectation of
	spending one or more IETF meetings in SGs, as well as an
	additional meeting or two in BOFs, before generating a
	typical WG charter."

I agree that this would be a bad thing -- and that's why the draft 
indicates that the experiment should not short-circuit creation of WGs 
that already satisfy the criteria.  In any case, the experiment only lasts 
18 months, and it seems unlikely that the IETF would devolve that quickly. 

        "In the notation of Lakshminath's
	recent chart, we have moved from "Idea -->  WG" being
	the normal case, to "Idea -->  BoF-1 --> BoF-2 --> WG"
	being the normal case"

Do the data back up this assertion?  Quite a few WGs have been 
formed after a single BOF, or if two BOFs were required, then the agenda of the 
second BOF was more like that of a WG than a BOF.  

"to some risk of making "Idea --> BoF-1  --> Bof-2 --> SG --> WG" normal."

I am personally not very enamored of this case.  If the second BoF fails, 
my inclination would be say "that's it".   I'm also not sure if a SG can 
be formed without a first BOF, because the document currently states that 
interest is a pre-requisite for SG formation, and how do we gauge that 
without at least one BOF?  

So IMHO, the "common case" is:

Idea --> BoF --> SG --> WG or nothing. 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.