Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT

To: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf at NLnetLabs.nl>
Subject: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:28:54 -0500
Cc: IAB IAB <iab at ietf.org>, The Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg at ietf.org>, IETF at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <5FCD348C-5927-4F18-A002-0E3BF21ED5F4@NLnetLabs.nl>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5FCD348C-5927-4F18-A002-0E3BF21ED5F4@NLnetLabs.nl>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824)

Thanks for this, Olaf. Indeed, we are considering follow-up work,
and understanding the scenarios & possible need for producing
a revised version of NAT-PT is on the Vancouver agenda (currently
planned to be a discussion in V6OPS, with protocol work to fall
out to an INT area WG).

Jari



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Olaf M. Kolkman

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on draft-aboba-sg-experiment-03.txt
Next by Date: Beware of fake pills
Previous by thread: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
Next by thread: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.