Re: A priori IPR choices [Re: Third LastCall:draft-housley-tls-authz-extns]

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

Phil, I understand what you're trying to do.  I agree that more wiggle
room makes it harder.

However I think that to achieve consensus you're going to need to
allow working groups to choose to turn on the wiggle room.

I think that you could get somewhere with an opt-in proposal.  For a
particular technology or WG, the WG can opt-in to something with very
little wiggle room.  I personally don't think you can do better than
that.

However I do think you could put together some standard optinos to
opt-in to.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf