![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On 2007-10-25 04:30, Sam Hartman wrote:
Simon> If you replace IBM with 'A Patent Troll', do you think the
Simon> same holds?
I think that such behavior should be presumed not to be a patent troll. Patent trolls are not known forpromising to give away royalty-free licenses.
They are also, in general, known for *not* particpating in the standards process, precisely to avoid falling under patent disclosure requirements. As far as non-participants are concerned, nothing in our rules matters.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.