Re: Offer of time on the IPR WG agenda for rechartering

[Ted Hardie <hardie at qualcomm.com>]

>I'd like the people who want time on the agenda to supply a text (preferably published as an I-D), which summarizes, as clearly as possible:
>
>- What they think has changed since the last IPR WG evaluation of patent policy
>
>- What changes in overall direction they think the WG should address
>
>- What the charter for this activity should look like
>
>If more than one such proposal should appear, I'd suggest giving each submitter a 5-10 minute slot for making their argument, and leaving at least half an hour for general discussion.
>
>Please submit I-Ds with the name pattern of draft-<submitter>-ipr-patent-<something> - that would make it easy for us to find them all.
>
>The timeslot for the WG is Tuesday morning from 0900 to 1130; the rechartering discussion would be within the time from 1030 to 1130.

Just to be clear, if someone has the view that documents like Simon's
how-to should be within the charter of the working group, but that there
are no changes needed to the base policy, do you still want an I-D?  Or
is a rationale submitted as a short statement enough?

					Ted

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf