TLS-authz

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: TLS-authz
From: Joshua N Pritikin <jpritikin at pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:31:04 -0700
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11)

Joshua Pritikin
2250 Patterson St. #160
Eugene, OR 97405

I have been made aware that the draft-housley-tls-authz-extns proposal 
is patent encumbered. If this is the case then I believe it would be 
unethical for IETF to endorse this proposal, even as an experimental 
standard.

-- 
Make April 15 just another day, visit http://fairtax.org

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Megatron (was: TLS-authz)
  - From: Frank Ellermann

Prev by Date: Re: A priori IPR choices
Next by Date: NO to TLS-authz
Previous by thread: IETF 70 - meeting conflict - any way to juggle schedule to accommodate?
Next by thread: Megatron (was: TLS-authz)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

TLS-authz

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.