NO to TLS-authz

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: NO to TLS-authz
From: "Chuck Burgess" <ashnazg at bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:45:06 -0500
Cc: campaigns at fsf.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; bh=rhagqfswa90WJi0TF5jCU3ke0NJkkzFdUv6T7RyaH7I=; b=UVOYwhf21PGGaHDz6tm0WagbsXKNrf0LKcKK+3iOpD+8ocMSM5+m3q8+PncMcIjAyCkgLb8o6P2Rb3Ee3HKdpAo7VPLcYMYHV6BmU45TER6cD3IgSU1x5ard4eTB96yROpt0wFmpZXc9o7INY8NHwMlQIYjkTfjpCosuWj5pSmU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=UJJf3fr3P+KdsZVKFQuEhNm78S0I/6ERRJFJDLEbXM9+kOUL2TxIEHXNcywCi9ap6PcALsLQ2lcXVczGIRzQvM3fAOtO80O5F0JzMq8q32fjjn+rHKUEHEbjn23Wnp6pGDsnWPKlnTaKZx2Iji4uSr71NbYILZQF2DL7+JEqM0g=
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello,

I support and second the comments previously sent to you by the FSF (http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/software-patents/draft-housley-tls-authz-extns.html ).

Please do not let this standardization attempt continue.
--
CRB

Let me introduce you to my very own DMCA-protected encryption key:
BC 1B 64 4A 8D DE 49 E8 C3 7D CC EE 1A AD EE F5
(compliments of Freedom-to-Tinker http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1155)

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.