TLS-authz "experimental" standard

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: TLS-authz "experimental" standard
From: "Richard Wilbur" <richard.wilbur at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:53:37 -0600
Cc: campaigns at fsf.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=7dA73W9FUlm5368EHlQSjWBuDs3kYuWUw1msFpbO9rQ=; b=YNymh+PMUwjela2W36PF5RQ1cl1CI8SMLUsl6b+crlTJjacXKMoXd+JYCICeQffUHkHlTVvxwIVj6cZnJ6fOAh3a9SBm0I2BOch8Kkv9mDZUyMRWJ6duWNj8ZCh8GftLpWhAUD7OBW7+HOspqZSdA71BooH+xMIsMpZ9DqhWnak=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=gbcG6qZhJlvr0fB8GDkxQZGi9OshiIrpsffVjt2Bfbn+dPa/SSpxx8p0NcAImiuGY8YUUt5T95UI32f5uFzoml+tm7mmUsboHumth91smF+BT0rU+f9A84QmmSuXLhiKodJ4VbMSxGtBB5bv2I5BM2S+Ikj8pZBtfCBR/JLTH8A=
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

To those considering the TLS-authz proposal:

The patent shenanigans of RedPhone Security have reduced
implementation status from "open" to "taxed at the whim of RedPhone
Security."  This should be enough to disqualify the proposal from
further consideration unless, and until, RedPhone Security grants a
royalty-free license for all users.

The imprimatur of the IETF should remain reserved for open standards.

Thank you for considering my position.

Sincerely,

Richard Wilbur
Senior Software Developer
Server Software

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Prev by Date: Please reject proprietary standards.
Next by Date: Re: An example of what is wrong with the IETF's IPv6 documentation
Previous by thread: Please reject proprietary standards.
Next by thread: TLS-authz "experimental" standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

TLS-authz "experimental" standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.