A pattented standard is not a standard

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: A pattented standard is not a standard
From: "J. Pablo FernÃndez" <pupeno at pupeno.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:47:58 +0100
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6

Hello,

The idea of an standard is to make communication possible and easy. A 
pattented standard is a call for chaos or a tax on communication. I'm very 
much with the FSF in opposing TLS-authz.

Thank you.
-- 
J. Pablo FernÃndez <pupeno at pupeno.com> (http://pupeno.com)

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: TLS Authorization
Next by Date: Please reject proprietary standards.
Previous by thread: TLS Authorisation
Next by thread: RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

A pattented standard is not a standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.