RE: A pattented standard is not a standard

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Subject: RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
From: Scott Brim <swb at employees.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:01:32 -0400
Authentication-results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=swb@employees.org; dkim=neutral
Cc: "J. Pablo Fernández" <pupeno at pupeno.com>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155707A4C9@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200710190047.59493.pupeno@pupeno.com> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155707A4C9@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>

On 26 Oct 2007 at 11:35 -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip allegedly wrote:
> Is this an official FSF campaign?

Half of them are CCed to fsf-campaign.  

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- A pattented standard is not a standard
  - From: J. Pablo Fernández
- RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
Next by Date: Re: A priori IPR choices
Previous by thread: RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
Next by thread: Re: A pattented standard is not a standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: A pattented standard is not a standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.