Re: A pattented standard is not a standard

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Subject: Re: A pattented standard is not a standard
From: "Bill Fenner" <fenner at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:53:34 -0700
Cc: "J. Pablo Fernández" <pupeno at pupeno.com>, ietf at ietf.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=5H1ayvzZf8eol5lU5cHqcQ3fajYKJNZWka6/xgHcOy8=; b=j++IKGkSmH4Ce+bYl9xHIu3K5NX2SOzvOILJ4VZfNJ2qLWc+rtIyueUxpVKRZa900cF8K6MjVx8obsGEUUavk72Rz0cMzauaYHFI7N1Lua3BEB3pv6ba2u62ASt1g0VshlCTzL0IoqKpQWuV+3cGvbec8+66PtDTfKbhV+M3kYU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cqHCzUtdQcti2LDlELOCzhPRwiW1NCCa9E+h0pcVvxRJJsLFUQL4Ir4zMZEnh0MjM5mIo5KjnSabSf+hP5vxPqicWjHb/0l3zxrKh6lxGAc3P9tBDl8DiOYs2Zg7+l+wxBkFIzuqJ90c/Rzl1AQqI8U+jCnIlVMPks2BVyUObvI=
In-reply-to: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155707A4C9@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200710190047.59493.pupeno@pupeno.com> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155707A4C9@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>

On 10/26/07, Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker at verisign.com> wrote:
> Is this an official FSF campaign?

Yes, http://www.fsf.org/news/oppose-tls-authz-standard.html

  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- A pattented standard is not a standard
  - From: J. Pablo Fernández
- RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: Re: Megatron
Next by Date: Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
Previous by thread: RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
Next by thread: RE: A pattented standard is not a standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: A pattented standard is not a standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.