Re: Free? Software Foundation

To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob at harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Free? Software Foundation
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:48:19 +0100
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20071029142023.04E96600545@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: NIC France
References: <20071029141645.GA22116@nic.fr> <20071029142023.04E96600545@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:20:23AM -0400,
 Scott O. Bradner <sob at harvard.edu> wrote 
 a message of 31 lines which said:

> you are asking the IETF to not publish an IETF doucment - what else
> can you call it?

So, each time in a Last Call, someone says "This document should not
be published", it is censorship? That's quite insulting for the
victims of real censorship.



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Free? Software Foundation
  - From: Scott O. Bradner

References:
- Re: Free? Software Foundation
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Free? Software Foundation
  - From: Scott O. Bradner

Prev by Date: Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz
Next by Date: Re: Silly TLS Auth lobbying
Previous by thread: Re: Free? Software Foundation
Next by thread: Re: Free? Software Foundation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Free? Software Foundation

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.