![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> So, each time in a Last Call, someone says "This document should not >be published", it is censorship? That's quite insulting for the > victims of real censorship. I do not recall another case where the IETF got requests to not publish documents in last call - most of the time there are constructive comments pointing out technical issues that might get fixed before publication. I have seen requests to not publish or delay publishing RFCs that had been submitted to a working group but were not chosen - those requesters were worried about the potential for confusion with the working group output - if memory serves, the RFC was published in almost all of tehse cases - but after a delay so the working group version could get published first in some cases. Scott _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.