Re: Experimental makes sense for tls-authz

[Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld at sun.com>]

On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 09:05 -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
> RFC 2026, section 10.4.(D), gives boilerplate to add to a document
> where there is known ipr:
> 
>          "The IETF has been notified of intellectual property rights
>          claimed in regard to some or all of the specification contained
>          in this document.  For more information consult the online list
>          of claimed rights."
> 
> RFC 3667 removed this policy, because the absence of a notice in the
> document doesn't mean that an ipr claim wasn'nomically sensible,<BR>whether in an RFC or not, whether made a =
formal standard or not.<BR>By having an open specification, users can at =
least understand<BR>the properties of the technology that is documented =
openly.<BR><BR>Just to be crystal clear, I do support publishing =
draft-housley-*<BR>as either Informational RFC or Experimental =
RFC.<BR><BR>Yours,<BR><BR>Ran<BR>rja at extremenetworks.com<BR><BR><BR>_____=
__________________________________________<BR>Ietf mailing =
list<BR>Ietf at ietf.org<BR><A =
href=3D"https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf";>https://www1.ietf.or=
g/mailman/listinfo/ietf</A><BR></FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C81A47.E5938F97--


--===============1316695427==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

--===============1316695427==--