Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard




I'd like to draw the attention of the IETF community to this document.
It seems hugely complex.  I'd like to ask those not involved in the
xcon working group to take time to read it and to consider whether
this complexity is necessary.

I'd particularly like to ask people to consider section 9.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf





 -0400
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042)
	id 427BB4A47; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:21:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
To: ietf at ietf.org
Cc: 
References: <E1IesfK-00022f-M2 at stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:21:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <E1IesfK-00022f-M2 at stiedprstage1.ietf.org> (The IESG's message of
	"Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:28:58 -0400")
Message-ID: <tslejfbbkcs.fsf at mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-xcon-framework (A Framework for
	Centralized Conferencing) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org



I'd like to draw the attention of the IETF community to this document.
It seems hugely complex.  I'd like to ask those not involved in the
xcon working group to take time to read it and to consider whether
this complexity is necessary.

I'd particularly like to ask people to consider section 9.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf






Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.