Experimental track (was: Non-participants)

["Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>]

Dan Riley wrote:
 
> there is some evidence that people presumably well versed in
> IETF process and RFC2026 terminology can be sloppy in its 
> application--from
 
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg04120.html
[...]
>| The IESG solicits final comments on whether the IETF community
>| has consensus to publish draft-housley-tls-authz-extns as an
>| _experimental standard_ given the IPR claimed.
 
> (_emphasis_ added)

Brilliant.  While they were at it they also sanctioned a new 
"experimental track".  IANA will be thrilled when I ask them
to implement "experimental standard" RFC 2345 because it's 
on "experimental track" suited for the IDN TLD experiment.

 Frank
-- 
http://www.google.com/search?cx=001904119753490578822:zvsejdqm-pw&cof=FORID:0;AH:center&q=%22experimental+track%22


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf