Re: Experimental track

["Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>]

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
 
> pretty clearly a cut-and-paste error. I agree that we
> can't expect non-participants to correct that error.

+1  

For a definition of "non-participant" somewhere between
"did not yet read RFC 4677" and "did not yet read all 
RFCs listed in ion-procdoc" (including 3669, I checked
that you have it... ;-)

 [experimental track] 
> There's nothing new about that phrase; a quick Google
> finds usage going back to 1998 at least.

My http://purl.net/xyzzy/-a9/%22experimental%20track%22
search found about 120 hits from potential participants.

 Frank


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf