Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update (IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field) to BCP

On 2007-11-6, at 2:08, ext Brian E Carpenter wrote: 
Red herring as far as this draft is concerned: I'd be interested
to know why we are still willing to allow non-disclosure for
port numbers (see RFC 2780 sections 8 and 9.1). Port numbers
are going fast.

We've recently been discussing port number allocation procedures with IANA, and changes may be coming.

Lars

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.